Though I have spent most of my life in America as a Texas resident, I have yet to see a series that truly taps into the madness of the place. The rampant, unrepentant hypocrisy is a given, but so is the inconsistency of most peopleās social and philosophical leanings. The same man who will happily, politely rescue you from a highway ditch in the aftermath of a car accident, and refuse any payment or even thanks in returnāsomething that actually happened to my familyāwill also bear bumper stickers on his truck that make clear his allegiance to his AK-47 and his hatred of abortion rights. Someday, someone will make a film or TV show that captures the profound strangeness of Texas, but that day, sadly, is not today.
Based on Texas native May Cobbās novel of the same name, āThe Hunting Wivesā is set in the fictional wealthy town of Maple Brook, Texas, to which Sophie OāNeil (Brittany Snow) has just moved with her architect husband Graham (Evan Jonigkeit) and seven-year-old son Jack (Emmet Moss). Sophie and Graham hail from Cambridge, Massachusetts (āWhere Harvard is,ā they add sheepishly, when new friends stare blankly hearing the cityās name).Ā

While Graham keeps busy building the headquarters of an oil company led by state governor-aspirant Jed Banks (Dermot Mulroney, doing a damn good job capturing the testosterone-charged obnoxiousness of rich oilmen), his anxiety-ridden wife, who gave up her career in public relations for political campaigns when she gave birth, struggles to cope with her new surroundings and its even more alien social circle. Maple Brook is run with steely, cowboy booted cattiness by wealthy housewives, never an eyelash out of place, who donate six figures to the local megachurch as easily as they flirt with 18-year-old high school jocks, and conduct lavish NRA fundraisers at their mansions. With enthusiasm that is both confident and casual, they organize shopping trips to the local (Chekhovās) gun emporium like theyāre putting gas in their SUVs. In contrast, Sophie struggles with an anxiety disorder and, as per her husbandās request after a DUI in her past, no longer drinks or drives. But that wonāt last long.Ā
Leading the charge for Sophie to embrace a looser, more hedonistic life is the queen bee of Maple Brook, Margot Banks (Malin Akerman), Jedās second wife, who works overtime to keep a tight, heavy lid on her sketchy past and her present dalliances. Her casual yet undeniable magnetism hooks Sophie upon their first meeting. Margotās attire (lots of cleavage, tight in all the right places), her charm, her slow but steady persuasion entices Sophie into everything she hasnāt touched for years. Downing whiskey and doing donuts in empty parking lots gives Sophie a new lease on life, though her jitters make her oblivious to the shifting dynamics in the friend group, including the obvious jealousy of Margotās best friend Callie (Jaime Ray Newman).Ā
Rounding out the cast is Jill (Katie Lowes), the reverendās wife, whose perfect veneer is stress-tested regularly by her husbandās coldness at home and the rash behavior (i.e., premarital sex with his wrong-side-of-the-tracks girlfriend Abby) of her Baylor-bound basketball player son Brad (George Ferrier), with whom she shares a deeply creepy relationship. And though everyoneās story is being told in flashback, in present day the body of a murdered woman has been found in the woods. Whoever could it be?!

To give credit where credit is due, at least Mulroney and Akerman are having a good time, with mostly solid accent work, making the best of the wobbly writing. Costume designer Heidi Higginbotham has a decent eye for differentiating the women on the show: thrifted items for Ashley and her mother Starr (Chrissy Metz), cowboy boots of various shades and textures for the cast depending on class and personality. Her arc for Sophieās attire is quite good, if a bit predictable: conservative dresses, blouses, and pants in white, black, or cream eventually morph, as does Sophie, into frocks in eye-catching colors and lower necklines. Just about every other creative choice, however, is a snooze. Snowās performance is too brittle, too slight to make a splash; Jonigkeit receives no characterization whatsoever (a shame, since heās capable of much more, as he proved in Netflixās dearly departed āArchive 81ā); and the writing, photography, and direction are as stale as the four-day-old brioche on my kitchen counter.
Sometimes I feel as though Iām beating a dead horse in my reviews, but it really is true: āThe Hunting Wivesā is the latest mediocre drivel being pushed down the audienceās throat in the name of art. Showrunner Rebecca Cutter, in her email to critics, calls the series āgood soapy fun, and I really donāt think thereās an existing comp for it.ā I politely beg to differ. āGrosse Pointe Garden Societyā covered similar ground, as did, once upon a time, āDesperate Housewives.ā Transposing the action to East Texas could provide fertile ground for exploring the psyche of the Southwest, but the writing simply does not bother. And of the three episodes I was permitted to watch, none really stood out as good or fun. Soapy, sure, but āWhy Women Killā was better at this game and showed off Janie Bryantās sublime costume work to boot.
Deep inside the sorry morass of dialogue and even weaker direction, is a compelling tale about how liberal white women can be seduced by conservatism. It doesnāt take much for Sophie to find salvation, freedom from her guilt in the endless parade of chic concealed weapons, megachurch-sourced redemption, snorted Xanax, and $25,000 bottles of whiskey. Apparently the book does not engender sympathy for Sophie as readily as the series does; in the novel, her idle hands, the result of being a stay-at-home parent for the first time in her adult life, drive her obsession with Margot and her friends. But the TV show is far less nuanced, and Sophie is merely a lamb led astray. Listening to Tanya Tucker is a far more entertaining experience than this series, now streaming on Netflix.
Three episodes screened for review. Now on Netflix.